Archive Your Project

Where to Deposit Software

The project is now ready to be deposited for long-term archival. When considering an appropriate repository, there are a few questions to ponder (excerpt from Jackson and The Software Sustainability Institute 2018, with footnotes removed, licensed under CC BY 4.0):

Does the digital repository give you a unique persistent digital identifier for your deposit?

Persistent digital identifiers are identifiers that are provided under the assumption that they, and the digital objects they refer to, will remain available long term. Examples of unique persistent digital identifiers include DOIs and ARKs. The use of persistent digital identifiers for research outputs, including papers, data and software, and the use of these for citation purposes, is becoming prevalent in research.

Can the digital repository accommodate the size of your deposit?

Digital repositories may have constraints on the size of deposits they accept. For example, Zenodo has a limit of 50 GB and the University of Edinburgh DataShare has a limit of 20 GB for deposits done via a browser and 100 GB otherwise.

Has your funder or publisher recommended or mandated a digital repository to use?

If both a funder and publisher mandate two different digital repositories you could deposit within them both, or discuss with each to see if they will agree for you to use one only, even if it is not the one they mandate.

Are the policies of the digital repository acceptable to you?

These can include terms and conditions of use; availability of the service (e.g. does the service regularly go down for updates or does it run 24/7); how resilient the service is to breakdowns; where deposits are stored; how they are stored; what are the plans for stored deposits if the repository goes out of business; how secure the storage is; how regularly it is backed up; how long backups are kept for; and what disaster recovery plans are in place. Knowing the quality of service can help you judge whether your deposit will be available to others, and yourself, even in the face of disaster. It also allows you, and your institution, to develop contingency plans should such drastic circumstances arise.

Is the longevity of the digital repository acceptable to you?

You want to know that the digital repository will host your deposit for as long as you need it too, not just 6 months or so. The policies or terms and conditions of the digital repository should state this. For example, Zenodo states that their lifetime is currently 20 years and figshare guarantees 10 years of persistent availability.

Is the digital repository free or do you have to pay a fee? If there is a fee, is this a one-off payment and can you afford it?

If a digital repository expects a one-off payment, to subsidise its hosting, you may be able to pay for this out of your project budget or your institution may pay this for you. It is recommended that you avoid any digital repository that expects a regular fee for the duration for which they hold the deposit, since it would most likely be unsustainable for your institution to commit to ever-increasing fees over a long term. There are many free digital repositories available.

Is the digital repository accredited or certified?

The digital repository may be accredited or certified by an independent agency that reviews digital repositories according to various criteria related to its policies and processes. The presence of an accreditation or certification may provide you with an additional degree of confidence that the digital repository meets your requirements. For example, the Data Seal of Approval can be awarded to digital repositories who satisfy a set of quality guidelines relating to how they manage, preserve and make available the deposits they hold. The presence of a Data Seal of Approval could give you additional confidence that a digital repository is suitable for holding your deposit.

Additional guidance is provided by d’Aquin et al. (2023), Garijo et al. (2022), and Science Europe (2021).

Using Zenodo to Archive Your Project

In the following we will demonstrate how to use Zenodo to archive one’s project and obtain a DOI.

Caution 1: Zenodo Sandbox

Note that during this tutorial, we will be using Zenodo’s sandbox instance located at sandbox.zenodo.org in order to learn how to use it while not wasting Zenodo’s resources. For real projects, use the production instance at zenodo.org, which requires a separate account.

First, create an account on the Zenodo Sandbox by clicking on Sign up in the upper right corner and submitting the provided form. Then, confirm your email address (also check your spam folder if you cannot find the confirmation email).

Now you can follow the guide “Create new upload”, taking into account the following notes specific to each step:

  • Add/remove files: To circumvent the file limit on Zenodo, you can bundle your project folder in one ZIP file and upload that instead.
  • Fill in metadata
    • Digital Object Identifier (DOI): Usually, you will want a DOI, therefore you need to choose No for the question whether you already have a DOI for this upload, and click on Get a DOI now!.
    • Resource type: Select the most appropriate one, for example, Publication / Preprint.
    • Licenses: If your project only contains content by you and if you previously only chose one license, you can select that by choosing Add standard. Otherwise, click on Add custom and describe how each file is licensed. If you have been using REUSE to record license information, you can run enter SPDX Document as title and run the reuse tool with reuse spdx -o reuse.spdx to create the file reuse.spdx. Then you can paste the content of reuse.spdx into the description field of the custom license as it contains information about the license of each file.

If you previously uploaded your project to a public Git repository (which we didn’t cover during this tutorial), you could also add the new DOI to your README, for example, under the section “Citation”.

Final Remarks

There are situations in which you are not allowed to share your data publicly. In this case, consider using a repository specifically for research data, which later grants access for valid uses individually.

For further information, you may be interested in Software Deposit Guidance for Researchers.

Back to top

References

d’Aquin, Mathieu, Fabian Kirstein, Daniela Oliveira, Sonja Schimmler, and Sebastian Urbanek. 2023. FAIREST: A Framework for Assessing Research Repositories.” Data Intelligence 5 (1): 202–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00159.
Garijo, Daniel, Hervé Ménager, Lorraine Hwang, Ana Trisovic, Michael Hucka, Thomas Morrell, Alice Allen, Task Force on Best Practices for Software Registries, and SciCodes Consortium. 2022. “Nine Best Practices for Research Software Registries and Repositories.” PeerJ Computer Science 8 (August): e1023. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1023.
Jackson, Michael, and The Software Sustainability Institute. 2018. “Software Deposit: Where to Deposit Software.” https://softwaresaved.github.io/software-deposit-guidance/WhereToDepositSoftware.html. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1327329.
Science Europe. 2021. “Practical Guide to the International Alignment of Research Data Management - Extended Edition.” https://scienceeurope.org/our-resources/practical-guide-to-the-international-alignment-of-research-data-management/. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4915861.